Perception of teachers about online and hybrid teaching in the post-pandemic context in brazilian higher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.v24i55.2842

Keywords:

Online teaching, hybrid teaching, digital information and communication technologies, public university, post-pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2020, significantly impacted university education, driving the use of digital technologies to ensure teaching continuity. This study aimed to understand teachers' perceptions of these modalities in the post-pandemic context at a public university in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. The research, of an applied and exploratory nature, adopted a qualitative approach. After the pandemic, 50% began adopting these practices, although significant resistance remains, primarily due to lack of training and technological challenges. The data indicate a preference for hybrid learning, combining face-to-face and online teaching. Most teachers find online teaching more challenging and believe that student performance is better in face-to-face teaching. Advantages of online teaching include the ability to invite speakers from different locations and the availability of multimedia resources, while disadvantages include lack of engagement and technological barriers. It is concluded that the pandemic catalyzed the adoption of online and hybrid methods, although resistance persists due to lack of training and technological challenges. Continued professional development of teachers, improvement of technological infrastructure, and exploration of AI are recommended to overcome these barriers. The study highlights the need for educational policies that promote a more resilient and inclusive model in post-pandemic higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Luan Carlos Santos Silva, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados - UFGD, Brasil

    Doctor en Ingeniería Producción por la Universidad Federal de Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brasil. Magíster en Ingeniería de Producción por la Universidad Tecnológica Federal de Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil. Magíster en Innovación y Desarrollo Emprendedor por la Universidad de Salamanca (USAL), España. Licenciado en Administración por la Facultad de Descubrimiento (FACDESCO), Brasil. Profesor en la Universidad Federal de Grande Dourados (UFGD), Brasil. Áreas de interés en investigación: Innovación, transferencia de tecnología, desarrollo de productos y servicios, diseño centrado en el usuario. Coordinador en el grupo de investigación LABin de la UFGD - Laboratorio de Investigación en Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología.

  • Marcia Danieli Szeremeta Spak, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil

    Doctora y Magíster en Ingeniería de Producción por la Universidad Tecnológica Federal de Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil. Licenciada en Administración por la Universidad Estatal de Ponta Grossa (UEPG), Brasil. Profesora en la Universidad Tecnológica Federal de Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil en el área de Administración. Áreas de interés en investigación: Enseñanza en Administración, Gestión de Procesos y Lean Thinking.

  • Valdimeire de Oliveira Lima, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Brasil

    Estudiando Maestría en Enseñanza de Matemáticas por la Universidad Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Brasil. Especialista en Educación Digital por la Universidad Estadual de Bahía (UNEB), Brasil. Especialista en Alfabetización y Lectoescritura, por la Universidad Candido Mendes (UCAM), Brasil. Licenciada en Pedagogía por la Universidad Estatal de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Brasil. Profesora en la Red Municipal de Feira de Santana, Brasil. Actuando como Coordinadora Pedagógica.  Áreas de interés en investigación: Temas curriculares, formación docente, por ejemplo, bases de conocimiento, aprendizaje significativo, interdisciplinariedad y educación digital. Participo en el grupo de investigación LABin - Laboratorio de Investigación en Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología de la Universidad Federal de Grande Dourados (UFGD), y en el Grupo Colaborativo en Educación Matemática (GCMEduc).

References

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.

Baker, R. S., y Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. En JA Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice (pp. 61-75).

Baran, E., y Correia, A. P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends, 58(5), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0

Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.

Bates, A. T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Routledge.

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., y Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Bland, C. J., y Schmitz, C. C. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. Academic Medicine, 61(1), 22-31.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Bozkurt, A., y Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Clark, R. C., y Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Center, P. R. (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Confident, Connected, Open to Change. Washington.

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-13.

Garfield, E. (1980). "Premature discovery" or delayed recognition—why. Current Contents, 21(33), 5-10.

Garrison, D. R., y Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 1, 3-21.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In: Moore, M. G. (Org). Handbook of distance education, (pp. 351-368). Routledge.

Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na (t) ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., y Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.

Holanda, V. R. D., Pinheiro, A. K. B., y Pagliuca, L. M. F. (2013). Aprendizagem na educação online: análise de conceito. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 66, 406-411. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672013000300016

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., y Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Horn, M. B., Staker, H., y Christensen, C. (2015). Blended: usando a inovação disruptiva para aprimorar a educação. Penso Editora.

Hunter, J. (2015). Technology integration and high possibility classrooms: Building from TPACK. Routledge.

Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., y Seaman, J. (2020). US Faculty and Administrators' Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online learning, 24(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285

Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New directions for institutional research, 141, 5-20.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., y Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers college record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Moore, M. G., Dickson-Deane, C., y Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Moran, J. (2015). Educação híbrida: um conceito-chave para a educação, hoje. Ensino híbrido: personalização e tecnologia na educação. Porto Alegre: Penso, 3(1).

Palma-Troncoso, M., Vallejos-Gómez, R. M., y Urra-Barra, G. (2024). Ser profesor en entornos virtuales: desafíos y demandas post pandemia a la formación inicial docente. Una aproximación desde la evaluación de futuros profesores y mentores. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 23(51), 197-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/rexe.v23i51.2156

Picciano, A. G. (2021). Theories and frameworks for online education. A guide to administering distance learning, 21(3), 166-190.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., y Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Rodrigues, S. A., Sarnighausen, V. C. R., Dal Pai, A., Sgoti, R. F., y Sutili, F. K. (2023). Percepções de discentes em engenharia sobre as atividades remotas do início da pandemia Covid-19. REXE: Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 22(50), 176-198. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.v22i50.1763

Rodríguez Guardado, M. D. S. (2022). Necesidades docentes durante la pandemia por COVID-19 en educación remota de emergencia. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(47), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162202202102147010

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New media y society, 6(3), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.

Silva, M. (2003). Educação online: teorias, práticas, legislação, formação corporativa. Edições Loyola.

Silva, M. (2018). Sala de aula interativa: educação, comunicação, mídia clássica. São Paulo: Loyola.

Silva, L. C. S. (2024). Gestión de la transferencia de tecnología para la innovación en las universidades públicas brasileñas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 95(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie9516201

Silva, L. C. S., Riedo, I. G., Mendonça, J. C. A., Nobre, L. B. O., & Maioli, S. F. V. (2024). Understanding smart cities: a systematic review. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 17, e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1983465973468

Silva, L. C. S., de Oliveira Lima, V., Caldeira, R. T., Zaparoli, D., y Pessoa, D. L. R. (2023). Perspectivas e possibilidades do ensino híbrido na educação superior no contexto pós-pandemia Covid-19 no Brasil. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 14(5), 7787-7808. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2151

Strauss, W., y Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company.

Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., y Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

Issue

Section

Investigación

How to Cite

Santos Silva, L. C., Spak, M. D. S. ., & Lima, V. de O. . (2025). Perception of teachers about online and hybrid teaching in the post-pandemic context in brazilian higher education. Revista De Estudios Y Experiencias En Educación, 24(55), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.v24i55.2842